FGM Must Be Termed Female Genital MUTILATION In Formal Contexts
The Global Woman P.E.A.C.E. Walk-A-Thon to End FGM, in Washington DC on 15 October 2016, brought together many activists from around the world – an exciting and truly inspiring experience, which I describe in more detail here.
I was privileged to attend the event as an Awardee (for my books) and I took the opportunity to deliver a very simple message: If we are serious about eradicating FGM we will call is as it is, Female Genital Mutilation. Here is the text of my brief address:
Thank you. Thank you all.
I am deeply grateful for this honour, and I want to acknowledge all the people who have made it possible….
My family, friends and colleagues who have offered support and advice; and, also really importantly, everyone who is in my books:
Those whose work I have drawn on and those, some of them here today, who have so generously allowed me to use their stories of courage and determination.
Every one of you deserves massive thanks for what you do.
So what can I offer at this point to help end FGM?
I have one idea to share. It costs nothing and it could happen right now.
When we talk formally, discussing this harmful traditional practice in professional and similar forums, let’s abandon the words ‘cutting’ (or indeed ‘circumcision’) and call FGM what it is – female genital ‘mutilation’.
Of course we will continue to use informal terms sometimes . Many different communities have many different words for FGM. But in policy and formal dialogue only one word is accurate … mutilation.
This is the term which women leaders demanded strongly that we use when they wrote the Bamako Declaration in 2005.
And ‘mutilation’ is also the term which Dr Morissanda Kouyate of the Inter-African Committee on Harmful Traditional Practices insists we must employ.
Let me repeat:
I know that sometimes vernacular language is appropriate. Other terms than ‘FGM’ must sometimes be used to achieve effective communication and clarity.
But the time has come to deny for ourselves as activists and thought leaders the comfort of euphemisms.
Let’s drop the use of language which softens our horror of FGM, and speak the truth we know.
FGM is cruel
– both in the way it forces itself on communities, on mothers and fathers who feel compelled to harm and hurt their daughters
– and, much more importantly still, FGM is a grim abuse of the human rights and futures of the defenceless children on whom it is practised.
Let’s stop the pretence that the act of FGM is in the end different from other forms of child abuse.
Let’s stop protecting ourselves in formal contexts from the reality that FGM is a truly hideous crime.
Polite terms, euphemisms, show disrespect to those activists who have for the last decade demanded that we tell it as it is.
Perhaps if, consistently and clearly, we call FGM ‘mutilation’ more of our leaders, who have the influence and power to change things, will insist urgently that the time for action has come.
We need to follow through, now, on the 4 Es of Eradication…
• Enforcement and
…. all the elements of any decent programme to promote the
health and well-being of communities anywhere.
What we don’t want is the comfort of the 5th E – Euphemisms.
Don’t let’s permit, for ourselves in formal contexts, the comfort of words which diminish the horror of FGM.
As Susan Masling, an attorney working to end FGM and one of our distinguished speakers today, has already said, FGM isn’t ‘FGC’; it’s mutilation.
Until we call it as it is, we are not doing our best to protect those who so desperately need protection from this terrible crime.
THANK YOU again for honouring my books; and thank you all for your work to #EndFGM.
[A note on terminology: The Inter-African Committee on Traditional Practices Affecting the Health of Women and Children, which has a primary focus on FGM, is clear that in formal discourse any term other than ‘mutilation’ concedes damagingly to the cultural relativists – though the terms employed may of necessity vary in informal discussion with those who by tradition use alternative vocabulary. See the Feminist Statement on the Naming and Abolition of Female Genital Mutilation, The Bamako Declaration: Female Genital Mutilation Terminology and the debate about Anthr/Apologists on this website.]
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Books by Hilary Burrage on female genital mutilation
For more detail and discussion of female genital mutilation please see my textbook, which considers in some detail the situation globally, but also explores the issues relating specifically to Western nations: Eradicating Female Genital Mutilation: A UK Perspective (Ashgate/Routledge, 2015). My second book, Female Mutilation: The truth behind the horrifying global practice of female genital mutilation (New Holland Publishers, 2016), contains narrative ‘stories’ (case studies) from about seventy people across five continents who have experienced FGM, either as survivors and/or as campaigners and activists against this harmful traditional practice.
FURTHER INFORMATION AND ACTION
There is a free FGM hotline for anyone in the UK: 0800 028 3550, or email:email@example.com
The (free) #NoFGM Daily News carries reports of all items shared on Twitter that day about FGM – brings many organisations and developments into focus.
Also available to follow at no cost or obligation is the #NoFGM_USA Daily News.
Facebook page: #NoFGM – a crime against humanity
This article concerns approaches to the eradication specifically of FGM. I am also categorically opposed to MGM, but that is not the focus of this particular piece.
Anyone wishing to offer additional comment on more general considerations around infant and juvenile genital mutilation is asked please to do so on the relevant dedicated thread, originally developed in June 2012:
Pending further notice (of a planned new blog, sometime later in 2016?), discussion of the general issues re M/FGM will not be published unless they are posted on this dedicated page. Thanks.