Skip to content

What Are Harmful Traditional Practices (HTPs)? Why Do They Occur?

March 20, 2016

12.05.05 cutting 004a

Harmful traditional practices (HTPs) are group-sanctioned but usually now illegal actions taken to reinforce the power of one person or group over (an)other/s.  HTPs occur in all societies but are more prevalent in less advantaged communities than elsewhere; and women and girls are more likely to be the victims of HTPs than are boys and men, albeit both experience them in specific contexts.  HTPs are historically underpinned by contests for scarce resources and economic control and power. The recent past has seen global moves to address the issues and stop these practices.

Some examples of harmful traditional practices are listed below. NB This is not pleasant reading.

Harmful traditional practices (HTPs) have existed, and still exist, in every human society. They comprise actions which are damaging to the individual/s concerned and which arise from group perceptions of who may impose their will on whom. Most HTPs involve physical as well as psychological harm, often long-term as well as immediate. They are often inflicted by sanctioned or appointed agents with the knowledge and consent of the group or community concerned, and may be justified or even approved via claimed religious or magic beliefs. Ultimately, however, HTPs are most often long-established mechanisms to sustain gender inequality and women’s powerlessness and economic disadvantage.

Some HTPs are directed at boys and men, most particularly, non-therapeutic male ‘circumcision’ or genital mutilation, which occurs in many locations around the world – and which some have also identified as a form of social control, as well as being a ‘group marker’.  Study of the origins and socio-economic mechanisms (and potential methodologies for cessation) in regard to MGM are a discipline in themselves, see e.g. https://www.genitalautonomy.org/ and Footnote below.

The majority of other HTPs are however directed at girls and women.  The most well-known example of this is female genital mutilation (FGM), which, with 200 million victims alive around the world today, is increasingly a focus of global concern.  Alongside this run also the global campaigns to eradicate parallel abuses such as child, early and forced marriage (CEFM), and human trafficking.

Other HTPs now coming to light have also evolved as a result of the perceived necessity, in some traditional settings, to ensure girls are ‘pure’ – sometimes via FGM and / or other practices which can be said to represent patriarchy incarnate.   The priority is that girls become brides in societies where a failure to be married can result in isolation and even destitution, perhaps death.  Similarly, girls are seen only as producers of babies and are not expected to lead independent lives; they therefore do not, in the view of their communities, require formal education.  Ultimately, they are expected to provide their parents with a pension via their husbands.

Amongst the organisations which seek to eradicate HTPs are the Inter-African Committee of Harmful Practices (IAC) and, in the UK, Afruca (Africans Unite Against Child Abuse), which also calls out practices relating to magic and so-called witchcraft.

Harmful traditional practices include

  • acid attacks
  • albino victimisation and sometimes killings (for ‘magic’ body parts)
  • beading (the practice of Morans – young warriors – laying claim to underage girls for sexual exploitation by buying beads and other ornaments for the victim; a similar Western practice is ‘grooming’)
  • breast ‘ironing’
  • child sexual abuse
  • child / early marriage (arranged marriage under the age of legal consent – sexual intercourse in such relations constitutes statutory rape as the girls are not legally competent to agree to such unions) and forced marriage (CEFM), also bride kidnapping
  • denial of education
  • denial of fertiltiy control / family planning / contraception / safe sex
  • domestic violence
  • dowry-related violence
  • ebinyo (teeth-pulling; four times as prevalent in girls as boys)
  • emotional and psychological violence
  • female genital mutilation (FGM)
  • gang or wartime rape
  • ‘honour’ stoning or killing
  • labia pulling (okukyalira ensiko)
  • leblouh or gavage (forced fattening)
  • male genital mutilation (non-therapeutic ‘male circumcision’) – can be fatal or very dangerous
  • maltreatment of widows and wife/widow inheritance (when the widow is forced to marry eg her late husband’s brother) / widow ‘cleansing’
  • physical punishment (including flogging)
  • polygamy
  • pimping (prostitution)
  • sexual assault
  • sexual harassment
  • stove burning
  • socio-economic violence
  • son preference and female feticide
  • ‘spirit child’ allegations
  • trafficking of women and girls (for sex), and sometimes also boys and men
  • twin infant killing and live burial of infants
  • virginity ‘tests’
  • witchcraft allegations

 

 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Hilary Burrage is author of

ERADICATING FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION (Ashgate/Routledge 2015)

and

FEMALE MUTILATION (New Holland Publishers 2016)

FURTHER INFORMATION AND ACTION

There is a free FGM hotline for anyone in the UK: 0800 028 3550, or email: fgmhelp@nspcc.org.uk

Details of NHS Specialist Services for FGM here.

The (free) #NoFGM Daily News carries reports of all items shared on Twitter that day about FGM – brings many organisations and developments into focus.

Also available to follow at no cost or obligation is the #NoFGM_USA Daily News.

Twitter: @NoFGM_UK  @NoFGMBookUK @FemaleMutlnBook  @FGMStatement  @NoFGM_USA @NoFGM_Kenya  @NoFGM_France  @GuardianEndFGM [tag for all: #NoFGM] and @StopMGM.

Facebook page: #NoFGM – a crime against humanity

More info on FGM here.

.

[NB The Inter-African Committee on Traditional Practices Affecting the Health of Women and Children, which has a primary focus on FGM, is clear that in formal discourse any term other than ‘mutilation’ concedes damagingly to the cultural relativists – though the terms employed may of necessity vary in informal discussion with those who by tradition use alternative vocabulary. See the Feminist Statement on the Naming and Abolition of Female Genital Mutilation,  The Bamako Declaration: Female Genital Mutilation Terminology and the debate about Anthr/Apologists on this website.]

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

PLEASE NOTE:

This article concerns primarily approaches to harmful traditional practices relating to women and girls.  I am also categorically opposed to MGM and other practices which harm men and boys, but that is not the specific focus of this particular piece.

Anyone wishing to offer additional comment on more general considerations around infant and juvenile genital mutilation is asked please to do so on the relevant dedicated thread, originally developed in June 2012:

The Other FGM Debate: Is Male Circumcision (MGM) Also Child Abuse?

Pending further notice (of a planned new blog, sometime after Autumn 2016?), discussion of the general issues re M/FGM will not be published unless they are posted on this dedicated page.  Thanks.

2 Comments leave one →
  1. August 29, 2016 11:00

    Reblogged this on UnCut/Voices Press and commented:
    We can all appreciate the marriage of economics and psychology in this pioneering explanation.

    • August 29, 2016 12:42

      Thank you, Tobe! It’s ongoing work – sadly, I’m sure as they are identified I shall be adding even more HTPs to this grim list – but I’d agree the fundamentals are becoming clear.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: