Skip to content

6 February: ‘Zero Tolerance For FGM’ Day In Britain And World-Wide

February 6, 2019

On 6 February 2003 the First Lady of Nigeria, Mrs. Stella Obasanjo, made the official declaration of Zero Tolerance for FGM during an event by the Inter-African Committee on Traditional Practices Affecting the Health of Women and Children (IAC). That date is now marked annually as we renew our determination to make FGM history;  and much has indeed been achieved – many of us know far more about FGM now than then – but in the UK as much as anywhere there remains a great deal to be done before we can start to hope our task is accomplished. These are some thoughts about progress in Britain which I wrote for the Morning Star today:

The practice of FGM has to be eradicated

Government cuts and a lack of commitment to the ethos of public health are allowing the abuse of girls and women to continue unchecked.

Sometimes events come together in a propitious manner; and so it is with the first-ever successful prosecution in the UK for female genital mutilation, just days before the date (6 February) when people around the globe declare Zero Tolerance of FGM.

Within a few days, both the UK and the world have shown a determination that FGM must become history; but sadly declarations do not necessarily equate to outcomes.

The ‘reasons’ why FGM has not been eradicated already are many.  Most nations around the globe now have legislation against FGM, explicitly or, as for instance in the case of France (where, as also in Kenya and some other countries, dozens of successful prosecutions have been achieved), implicit.   Laws alone however cannot secure cessation of criminal action, even in such serious matters of human rights abuse and cruelty.

The social norms which underlie the practice of FGM and other harmful, often traditional, practices (HTPs) such as child, early and forced marriage (CEFM) and breast ‘ironing’ are embedded in the beliefs of the communities in which they are practised. FGM presents in many different ways in different places, but has been happening for thousands of years.

New estimates by the World Health Organisation and UNFPA suggest that at least 200 million women now alive have undergone FGM, and that this figure will not abate (in fact, it will increase) for decades yet.  It is, like international human trafficking, a critical part of the enduring economic structures of areas and regions where it occurs. Those involved have a massive interest in ensuring it continues.  We are seeing a global epidemic of FGM.

Ideas around human rights and individual autonomy are still new, or even unrecognised, in many regions of the world (and yes, including significant parts of the so-called first world); and the people whose rights and autonomy are most severely constrained are usually – though of course not always – women and girls.  In such contexts FGM and other harmful practices thrive.

But what does this tell us about FGM in Britain? Why are thousands of new cases of FGM reported (as they must) by clinicians every year?  Why is it said that around 150 thousand women and girls in the UK have experienced, or are at significant risk of genital mutilation?

Let’s start with the caveats:  the UK statistics are not very solid.  FGM is recorded as occurring even when the damage is in fact piercing, often the location in which FGM occurred is not recorded (accurately, or at all), and estimates of national figures overall are based on questionable extrapolations from figures for countries where FGM is known to be practised.  There’s much work to do to before we have precise data from which to develop appropriate locality-based preventative and treatment services.

Nonetheless, FGM happens in the UK, as the recent conviction shows. Hopefully, information gained in this case will lead to better protection of girls in future, and perhaps to the apprehension of more FGM practitioners.  (Though the authorities do face some conundrums in determining action: never forget that most women who inflict FGM on young girls are themselves ‘cut’. They cannot be excused, but they are also due some compassion for the likely trauma they experienced.)

All that said, we in the UK could do much better.  It is disingenuous of DfID to announce large (and welcome) sums for End FGM work in Africa, whilst at the same time funding for some British organisations is reduced.  Why was the nascent national FGM unit set up at the end of the last Labour administration abandoned via the Government’s austerity measures?  Why is its more recent successor expected to become increasingly self-sustaining?  Since when has stopping FGM been the responsibility of private business?

The ethos of Public Health – prevention is better in every way than ‘cure’ – has taken a huge hit under the present political administration. Gone is the notion that communities are the fundamental bedrock of good health and well-being.  Gone too is the idea that community activists need adequate support and resources to deliver formal aspirations of harm reduction.  There is palpable resentment amongst some activists that they are expected to undertake on-the-ground engagement to stop FGM without funds (whilst also having no support when others in their communities see them as selling out to ‘western ways’).

Similarly, the Government says it wants everyone to have equal opportunities whilst at the same time it refuses to believe women refugees and asylum seekers who resist deportation because they fear their daughters may be forced to undergo FGM, or to be ‘married’ as a child, if they go ‘home’ – a place their children may never have been before.

And still the formal processes to address child abuse, of which FGM, CEFM and underage assault are examples, lack coherency.  Many legal, clinical and teaching and other professionals will need learn more about the signs and consequences of these crimes if they are to be prevented – as the recent Rotherham and Oxford child exploitation cases demonstrate only too well.  Why aren’t the Local Safeguarding Children Boards (LSCBs) centre stage in preventing abuse?  Why are they based on local authority boundaries?  Where is the national co-ordination? And why is it okay for members of these boards not to attend? Why are professional still so anxious about sharing concerns that a child has been, or may be, harmed?

The Red Book (child health record begun at birth) should record at regular intervals that baby girls (and maybe boys too) are intact.  Boys are already inspected to check their testicles are alright.  No baby objects to examination; it’s parents who resist.

So too with the school curriculum.  Significant moves have been made in developing PSHRE (personal, social, health and religious education, including FGM), but some parents remove their children from these most sensitive parts of that curriculum.  All children surely have the right in an age-appropriate way to know how their bodies are developing, what adult relationships entail, and, crucially, how to protect themselves, their siblings and their friends from harm.

FGM and harmful traditions are fundamentally about economics. Sometimes the business aspect is overt – how many more cattle will you give me if my daughter is sold as a ‘cut’ (‘pure’) bride-to-be, than if she is uncut without the status of an adult?  Sometimes the economics is buried further into the understandings of traditional communities – FGM indicates clan adherence.  But in all cases this is patriarchy incarnate, the physical imposition of leaders (men’s) will on female bodies.

As the Day of Zero Tolerance declares, female genital mutilation has to stop.

Read more about Zero Tolerance for FGM

Your Comments on this topic are welcome.  
Please post them in the box which follows these announcements…..

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Books by Hilary Burrage on female genital mutilation

18.04.12 FGM books together IMG_3336 (3).JPG

Eradicating Female Genital Mutilation: A UK Perspective (Hilary Burrage, Ashgate / Routledge 2015).
Full contents and reviews   HERE.
FEMALE MUTILATION: The truth behind the horrifying global practice of female genital mutilation  (Hilary Burrage, New Holland Publishers 2016).
Full contents and reviews   HERE.


There is a free FGM hotline for anyone in the UK: 0800 028 3550, or email:

Details of NHS Specialist Services for FGM here.

More info and posts on FGM here.

Activists, service providers and researchers may like to join the LinkedIn group Female Genital Mutilation (FGM): Information, reports and research, which has several hundred members from around the world.

The (free) #NoFGM Daily News carries reports of all items shared on Twitter that day about FGM – brings many organisations and developments into focus.

Also available to follow at no cost or obligation is the #NoFGM_USA Daily News.

Twitter accounts:          @NoFGM_UK  @NoFGMBookUK @FemaleMutlnBook  @FGMStatement  @NoFGM_USA @NoFGM_Kenya  @NoFGM_France  @GuardianEndFGM [tag for all: #NoFGM] and @StopMGM.

Facebook page: #NoFGM – a crime against humanity

Email contact: via Hilary


[NB The Inter-African Committee on Traditional Practices Affecting the Health of Women and Children, which has a primary focus on FGM, is clear that in formal discourse any term other than ‘mutilation’ concedes damagingly to the cultural relativists – though the terms employed may of necessity vary in informal discussion with those who by tradition use alternative vocabulary. See the Feminist Statement on the Naming and Abolition of Female Genital Mutilation,  The Bamako Declaration: Female Genital Mutilation Terminology and the debate about Anthr/Apologists on this website.]


This article concerns approaches to the eradication specifically of FGM.  I am also categorically opposed to MGM, but that is not the focus of this particular piece.

Anyone wishing to offer additional comment on more general considerations around infant and juvenile genital mutilation is asked please to do so via these relevant dedicated threads.

Discussion of the general issues re M/FGM will not be published unless they are posted on these dedicated pages. Thanks.

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: