Skip to content

Female Genital Mutilation In Britain: A Scandal About To Break…? (And The Risks Of Summer ‘Holiday’ FGM)

June 7, 2012

A version of this blog is the lead article today (7 June 2012) in the UK Huffington Post.  Public awareness and concern about the awfulness of FGM is growing, as the active Huffington Post Comments debate which follows the piece demonstrates. Averaged over a year, 50+ children every single day are at risk in the UK; but still no legal sanctions have ever been applied.
How much longer must we wait before effective, substantive action backed up by proper national resourcing is at last a reality?

Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) In Britain: A Scandal About To Break…?

Every year upwards of 20,000 young girls in Britain are at risk, or already victim, of female genital mutilation (FGM, or ‘cutting’).  Yet never has there been a successful court case in the UK against the perpetrators of this barbaric child abuse. Nor has there ever been any action against professionals have failed to protect the victims, whose fate, albeit with different intent, is sometimes as grave as that of the tragedy of Baby P.

What you are about to read is of necessity unpleasant and disturbing, but a wider awareness in the UK of FGM is one step towards eradicating it as soon as possible.

Summer ‘holiday’
Imagine: you are a young girl, perhaps living in one of the UK’s larger cities; and this is the summer when you are old enough to travel abroad, back ‘home’ for your long holiday, to spend it with the community in which your parents or their relatives grew up.  It will be hot, and exciting, and perhaps there will be a big party to celebrate your approaching adulthood

But in reality for you the festivities may involve very little personally to celebrate.  Whilst your mother, grandmother, aunts and others may gain prestige from your rite of passage, and your father and brothers are pleased that you are now marriageable, for you the summer will bring deep psychological trauma, intense pain and probably life-long physical damage, possibly even death.

Child cruelty
The real reason, it will transpire, that you are being taken away from Britain is that you are to undergo female genital mutilation (FGM), the removal, often by female relatives, of some or all of your external sexual parts, followed in many cases by infibulation – sewing up the open wound so that only a tiny hole remains, and where before there were healthy, elastic passages, there is now only scarring and the daily evidence of the damage wrought on your most intimate person.  The subtext of FGM is the subjugation of women, in cultures where they are seen only as adjuncts to men.

And this excruciating procedure during your ‘holiday’ will usually be inflicted by brute force, without pain relief and with no regard to hygiene or even (because you may be one of a batch of girls undergoing the procedure) cross-infection. You are also probably going to have your legs bound together for the duration as your body attempts to heal itself, and you are going to feel very ill.

Long-term damage
Well, let us leave the graphic detail there. Specifics may change, sometimes the procedure is even carried out covertly in the UK, but the overall horror of FGM is a constant.

It takes little further imagination to understand that the outcomes for our small girl, especially if she undergoes one of the more severe forms of FGM (the World Health Organisation, WHO, lists four types or levels of severity), can include serious physical and psychological impediments to normal adult sexual activity, severe obstetric and gynaecological problems, permanent disabling fistula, risk to her babies, daily personal and social inconvenience and embarrassments, and recurrent pain.

‘Cultural’ norms
Yet quite possibly this child will not be aware that things could be so different, because hers is also the experience of the other girls and women with whom she shares her life.  It may be the cultural norm in her community, even in the UK. There are globally about 140 million women now alive who have experienced FGM; and a growing number of them, perhaps 80,000, are in Britain.

But how we ask can this sort of cruel, sometimes lethal, child abuse be happening on such a scale, in the UK?  Not only is the protection of children from harm formally a high priority, but there is established legislation both to forbid the practice of FGM in Britain, and also to forbid its procurement, or taking British children abroad for the procedure.

Safe-keeping abandoned?
The answer is complex – an amalgam on the part of those with child safe-keeping responsibilities (doctors, nurses, teachers, social workers etc) of ignorance, lack of training, fear of being labelled racist, misplaced cultural concerns, sheer lack of resources and much else.  Things are however changing.

In May 2012 the Sunday Times ran a big story about medically involved men in Birmingham who, it is alleged, were found to be willing in confidence to arrange FGM procedures.  The police are now involved, arrests have been made and media interest is high.

Perhaps a turning point
This may at last be a turning point. The lid is lifting on the widespread misery and plain, criminal child abuse which FGM comprises.  Recognition is growing that, assuming official UK estimates are correct, at least two children every hour, every day, may be at risk. To most of us, that is a statistic beyond belief.

Public horror and professional panic will probably rise in parallel, if the current FGM-related arrests lead to trial and perhaps conviction. Already, there are campaigns, and an international Avaaz petition to bring FGM in Britain to an end has secured approaching 80,000 signatures. What happens after that is a close call.

Legal sanctions, maybe backlash?
The failure so far of relevant safe-keeping professionals to secure even one conviction for FGM (a crime which in Britain carries a sentence of up to 14 years imprisonment) is in part because of cultural factors – both community and professional – and in part because the resources and training simply aren’t at present available.  But this may not protect people who should be protecting children at risk of FGM, any more than it has protected the children themselves.

The repercussions of the Baby P tragedy, fairly or not, included sackings of social workers and upheaval in a public service already under massive strain.  In the case of FGM, not only social and health workers, but also the police, teachers and others may find themselves in the firing line.  Yet nationally-led strategic planning and resources remain totally inadequate to the task of supporting those responsible for FGM child safe-keeping.

Added to this may be a serious social, perhaps even racist, backlash; the temptation in some quarters to blame entire communities for these barbaric acts will require skilled and careful handling, at a time when even the resources to cope with the crime itself are derisory.

Parliamentary response
There is some evidence that politicians are waking up to the increasing risk of FGM in Britain.  Back in 2000 the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Population, Development and Reproductive Health published a Hearings on FGM Report (the legislative recommendations of which were subsequently enacted), and a decade later, with numbers at risk of FGM apparently rising rapidly, has seen the inception in November 2011 of an All-Party Parliamentary Group on FGM; then in May 2012 another Early Day Motion on the subject was posted.

Warm words alone however are nothing.  And it is very worrying that a carefully considered e-petition demanding more action on FGM which a number of us as UK citizens submitted to the HM Government No.10 website was summarily rejected by the Cabinet Office (May/June 2012).

Prevention is partial
Addressing FGM is about bringing communities together, men and women of all creeds and none, and providing decent services to protect children in every part of our country.  But at present such services are patently ineffectual, and there are almost no agencies outside London dedicated to preventing FGM (even though there are a few against male circumcision), leaving about two thirds of girls at risk in Britain almost invisible.

And even greater cross-community integration, cultural adaptions and better educational and social prospects to empower previously subjugate women will not ensure that harmful traditional beliefs and practices are abandoned, unless the flights abroad for summer ‘holidays’ are brought to a halt, and the full weight of UK law is enacted to back up education and inclusion.

Protection and prospects
Those in the UK at risk or already victims of female genital mutilation are defenceless babies and small girls, in their thousands, in British towns and cities.

Anyone with half a heart would do everything possible to remediate and stop this criminal cruelty.  And anyone with half a mind would understand that failure to stop FGM, now, is a route to massive demands on services and enormous damage to individuals and to society, tomorrow.

For more information see NoFGM: A Listing For Action & References On Female Genital Mutilation.

This article is expressly about FGM. To discuss male circumcision please go to this post: The Other FGM Debate: Is Male Circumcision Also Child Abuse?

* The NSPCC now (2014) have a voluntary reporting and advice phone line for FGM. They do not endorse calls for mandatory reporting, but say they welcome comments on this position (same link). If you are worried that a child may be at risk of FGM, you can contact the NSPCC 24 hour helpline anonymously on 0800 028 3550 or email  [ See Let’s Drop The Clichés: Mandatory Reporting And Simple Protocols Are Essential To Prevent FGM And Other Child Abuse ]

~ ~ ~

If you have a Twitter account and would like to draw more attention to these issues, please use the hashtag   #NoFGM  and follow  @NoFGM_UK.  Thank you.

2 Comments leave one →
  1. Ros Burnett permalink
    June 12, 2012 18:18

    A longer version of my comment than was permitted on HuffPostUK:
    Great to see this hard hitting and up-to-date article about female genital mutilation (FGM). Congratulations on getting it published in the Huffington Post. I note though that many of the Comments in response to it seemed to use it as a platform to discuss to that other subject: male circumcision (MC). It is a shame that the two subjects tend to get conflated; and that the term ‘female circumcision’ is still often used as a synonym for FGM. Without wishing to take away from moral and health arguments against male circumcision, it is regrettable that discussions of FGM tend to get hijacked by protesters against MC. It’s a bit like grouping together thunderstorms and tsunamis. Yes, there are some overlapping characteristics but, there are many additional aspects in FGM that make it far more devastating and terrible. The harm done in the majority of male cases and in the majority of female cases is of an entirely different order – because of the differences in how and when the ‘procedure’ is typically done, and of course because of the differences in male and female genitalia and reproductive organs. Hilary’s article makes clear the torturous, brutal nature of the injuries inflicted on little girls and young teenagers, in the name of helping them towards become marriageable women. FGM is child abuse and assault at its worst.

    I have some sympathy with men’s arguments that male circumcision should also be recognised as a form of child abuse, and the fact that male circumcision is generally accepted and legal makes it troubling in its own way. As with FGM, MC is a violation of their human rights because it is necessarily done without their consent; and it is a permanent change to a part of their body which, many discussions suggest, impacts on the quality of sexual experiences. But, important though it is, sexual pleasure is probably the least concern of girls and women when FGM impairs their subsequent bodily functions of urinating, menstruating and giving birth. It would be better if the term ‘female circumcision’ was not applied because it implies the removal of a layer of skin whereas the procedure applied to girls involves the removal of the entire clitoris, and often much more, as Hilary Burrage explains. FGM has for too long remained hidden, unknown to cultures which do not practice it and it would be regrettable if recent campaigns to raise awareness of it were diluted by arguments against male circumcision.

  2. June 24, 2013 09:57

    Breakthrough! >> *NSPCC FGM HELPLINE* set up today, 24 June 2013

    Call: 0800 028 3550

    Female Genital Mutilation is child abuse. If you are worried a child may be a victim, or at risk of female genital mutilation don’t wait until you’re certain, contact the NSPCC immediately.

    In the UK, people from the following communities are most at risk of FGM:
    Bohra-Dawoodi (Pakistani and Indian)
    Sierra Leonean

    Don’t let socio-cultural pressures get in the way of protecting children.

    FGM is a harmful “cultural” practice, but it is not a religious one. Carrying out this practice has been a criminal offence in the UK since 1985. However, there has not been a single prosecution to date.

    As with other forms of child abuse, these crimes often remain hidden and unreported, as children are too ashamed or afraid to speak out.

    You can call the NSPCC helpline on 0800 028 3550 and send emails to, text on 88858 or use the NSPCC Helpline online form:

    More information on female genital mutilation here:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: